1.1. The GPT Lineage (GPT-1 → GPT-4)

Generative AI & LLM Interview Guide for Top Roles (2025)

Large Language Models (LLMs)

3 min read 619 words

🪄 Step 1: Intuition & Motivation

Core Idea: GPT models are like supercharged next-word predictors that grew so large and well-trained that they accidentally learned reasoning, translation, summarization, and more — all without being explicitly told to.
Simple Analogy: Imagine you’re reading a story aloud, guessing each next word. The more books you’ve read in your life, the better you get at guessing what comes next — even if it’s a topic you’ve never seen before. GPTs are machines that became masters at this “next-word guessing game.”

🌱 Step 2: Core Concept

Let’s unpack how GPT evolved — one generation at a time.

GPT-1: The Humble Beginning

GPT-1 (2018) was like a student learning language by reading before testing. It trained on a large amount of text without labels (unsupervised pretraining), learning grammar and semantics just by predicting the next word. Then, it was fine-tuned on small labeled datasets to perform specific tasks (like sentiment analysis).

Core Idea: Learn general language patterns → specialize later.
Architecture: 12-layer Transformer decoder-only model.
Objective: Minimize next-token prediction error using causal masking (so the model can’t “peek” ahead).

GPT-2: The Surprise Polyglot

GPT-2 (2019) ditched task-specific fine-tuning and focused on sheer scale — 1.5 billion parameters. It trained on a diverse web corpus (WebText) using the same objective: predict the next token.

The surprise? Without explicit training for summarization, translation, or Q&A — it could do all of them. Why? Because predicting the next token in massive text implicitly teaches all those patterns.

Key Shift: From “pretrain → fine-tune” to “pretrain once, use prompts.”
Architecture: 48-layer decoder with multi-head attention and positional encodings.
Core Behavior: Emergent generalization — a model that adapts via prompts instead of retraining.

GPT-3: Scale Becomes the Secret Sauce

GPT-3 (2020) pushed scale to 175 billion parameters and trained on 45 TB of text. With enough data and parameters, something magical happened — the model started exhibiting in-context learning: it could learn a task just from seeing a few examples in the prompt.

Core Mechanism: Scaling laws — performance improves predictably with more parameters and data.
Architecture: 96 Transformer layers with parallelized attention and residual connections.
Key Insight: “More is different.” Beyond a certain scale, models begin reasoning, not memorizing.

GPT-3 didn’t need separate models for classification, summarization, and reasoning. Instead, it understood instructions in plain language — a step toward “natural interfaces” for machines.

GPT-4 & GPT-4o: The Era of Efficiency and Multimodality

GPT-4 (2023) and GPT-4o (2024) represented a leap in architectural complexity — introducing Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) layers and multimodal capabilities.

MoE: Instead of activating every neuron for every input, the model routes data through only a few “expert subnetworks.” This massively improves efficiency while retaining capacity.
Multimodality (GPT-4o): The model can understand text, images, and even audio — treating all of them as “tokens” in a unified space.

Think of GPT-4 as a “council of specialists.” Depending on the question — math, poetry, or images — it routes your query to the most suitable expert.

Why It Works This Way

GPTs thrive because language itself is structured — grammar, logic, and meaning follow predictable patterns. By forcing the model to predict the next token repeatedly over billions of examples, it ends up internalizing not just patterns, but concepts.

It learns conditional probability: $P(\text{next word} | \text{previous words})$. With scale, this probability distribution becomes rich enough to encode reasoning, analogy, and abstraction.

How It Fits in ML Thinking

GPT exemplifies self-supervised learning: the model uses the world’s text as its own teacher. It shows that general intelligence may emerge from predicting sequences — a unifying idea behind all modern LLMs.

📐 Step 3: Mathematical Foundation

The Autoregressive Objective

$$ L = - \sum_{t=1}^{T} \log P(x_t | x_{

$x_t$: the token at position $t$.

$x_{<t}$: all tokens before $t$.

The model learns to maximize the probability of the correct next token.

Each prediction is like saying, “Given everything I’ve read so far, what’s the most likely next word?” Training on millions of such steps teaches the model to think forward.

🧠 Step 4: Key Assumptions

Language has structure: The model assumes that patterns in words are meaningful and consistent.
Context defines meaning: Words don’t exist in isolation; their neighbors shape interpretation.
More data = more intelligence: Exposure to diverse, high-quality text improves generalization.

⚖️ Step 5: Strengths, Limitations & Trade-offs

Learns directly from raw text (no labels).
Generalizes across diverse tasks using prompting.
Scales predictably — performance improves with data and parameters.
Enables “in-context learning” without retraining.

Computationally expensive to train and serve.
Prone to hallucination (it predicts fluent nonsense).
Limited by context window — cannot remember beyond its input tokens.
Still lacks true understanding — it predicts patterns, not truth.

GPT’s power comes from simplicity: one training objective, one architecture.
But the trade-off is cost — massive compute for emergent behavior.
Real intelligence emerges from scale, not clever design tweaks.

🚧 Step 6: Common Misunderstandings

🚨 Common Misunderstandings (Click to Expand)

“GPT understands language like humans.” No — it models statistical relationships between words, not human meaning.
“Bigger models just memorize.” Incorrect — memorization saturates quickly; beyond that, scale builds abstraction.
“Prompting is programming.” Prompting guides the probabilistic reasoning of the model; it’s not deterministic logic.

🧩 Step 7: Mini Summary

🧠 What You Learned: GPTs are autoregressive Transformers that learn by predicting the next token — scaling this idea led to reasoning and generalization abilities.

⚙️ How It Works: They model $P(\text{next token} | \text{previous tokens})$ through massive text exposure.

🎯 Why It Matters: This single mechanism became the foundation for all modern LLMs, enabling zero-shot learning and flexible language reasoning.

1.2. Transformer Internals