3.1. Implement HDBSCAN from Scratch (Conceptually)

5 min read 981 words

🪄 Step 1: Intuition & Motivation

Core Idea (in 1 short paragraph): Behind HDBSCAN’s intimidating name lies a logical flow of steps that can be visualized like building and pruning a forest. You start by measuring how close everyone is (distances), then find which areas are dense (core distances), connect everyone through the shortest possible roads (MST), and finally trim the weakest connections until only stable clusters remain standing. Every step has a clear mathematical purpose — density estimation, graph construction, and hierarchical pruning — all tied together beautifully.
Simple Analogy: Imagine a group of islands connected by bridges. Some islands are close and easy to connect, others are far apart. You first calculate all bridge distances, connect the islands using the smallest total bridge length, and then slowly remove the longest bridges. The result? Natural archipelagos (clusters) that remain connected even when weak links disappear.

🌱 Step 2: Core Concept

Step 1: Compute Pairwise Distances

Compute all pairwise distances between data points — this defines the geometric relationships among them.
Typically uses Euclidean distance: $$ d(a, b) = \sqrt{\sum_i (a_i - b_i)^2} $$
For $n$ points, this step has a time complexity of $O(n^2)$ and memory cost proportional to storing $n^2$ distances.

This is like measuring the “road distance” between every pair of cities before you build a transport map.

Step 2: Determine Core Distances

For each point $p$, find its core distance — the distance to its min_samplesth nearest neighbor: $$ \text{core_dist}(p) = \text{distance to the min_samples}^{th} \text{ nearest neighbor} $$
This tells you how dense each point’s local area is. Smaller core distance = denser region.

If you stand in a crowd, your “core distance” is how far you’d need to stretch your arm to touch your min_samplesth neighbor.

Step 3: Construct Mutual Reachability Distances

Define the mutual reachability distance between any two points $a$ and $b$: $$ d_{\text{mreach}}(a, b) = \max(\text{core_dist}(a), \text{core_dist}(b), d(a, b)) $$
This ensures that connections across sparse regions appear longer — reducing “chaining” effects between low-density areas.

Think of this as measuring not just how far two cities are, but how hard it is to travel between them given their local terrain (density).

Step 4: Build Minimum Spanning Tree (MST)

Treat each point as a node and each mutual reachability distance as an edge weight.
Construct a Minimum Spanning Tree (MST) using Kruskal’s or Prim’s algorithm.
- MST connects all nodes with the smallest total weight.
- This forms the backbone for later hierarchical splitting.

The MST is the skeleton of your data landscape — it connects everything through the most natural, density-respecting paths.

Step 5: Perform Cluster Condensation

Progressively remove the highest-weight edges (least dense connections) from the MST.
As edges are cut, subtrees (groups of points) form — representing potential clusters.
Apply the min_cluster_size filter: remove or merge subtrees smaller than this threshold.
This pruning process builds the condensed hierarchy, where stable clusters persist over wide ranges of density thresholds.

It’s like slowly breaking apart a tree of connected islands — only the most strongly bonded groups remain as stable landmasses (clusters).

Step 6: Extract Stable Clusters

Track how long each cluster exists (persistence) as density thresholds change.
Assign stability scores using: $$ \text{Stability}(C) = \int_{\lambda_{\text{birth}}}^{\lambda_{\text{death}}} |C(\lambda)| , d\lambda $$
Retain clusters with the highest stability values; others are marked as noise.

If clusters were living organisms, their “stability score” would measure lifespan — longer-lived clusters are more biologically significant.

📐 Step 3: Pseudocode Overview

Here’s a conceptual pseudocode view to tie it all together:

HDBSCAN(data, min_samples, min_cluster_size):
    # Step 1: Compute pairwise distances
    D = compute_distance_matrix(data)

    # Step 2: Compute core distances
    core_distances = find_core_distances(D, min_samples)

    # Step 3: Compute mutual reachability
    for each (a, b) in D:
        mreach[a, b] = max(core_distances[a], core_distances[b], D[a, b])

    # Step 4: Build MST
    MST = build_minimum_spanning_tree(mreach)

    # Step 5: Condense hierarchy
    hierarchy = condense_tree(MST, min_cluster_size)

    # Step 6: Extract stable clusters
    clusters = extract_stable_clusters(hierarchy)
    
    return clusters

This sequence reveals the algorithm’s dual identity: graph-theoretic at its core, but density-based in spirit.

🧠 Step 4: Bottlenecks and Computational Trade-offs

Distance Computation ($O(n^2)$): The most expensive step — computing pairwise distances dominates both time and memory for large $n$.
Memory Usage: Storing the full distance matrix scales quadratically — infeasible for millions of points.
Possible Solutions:
- Use approximate nearest neighbor (ANN) methods (FAISS, Annoy) to estimate distances efficiently.
- Employ sparse graph representations to avoid full pairwise storage.
- Use GPU acceleration (RAPIDS cuML) for distance and MST computation.

In practice, almost all HDBSCAN performance tuning revolves around handling the O(n²) distance bottleneck.

⚖️ Step 5: Strengths, Limitations & Trade-offs

Each step has a clear geometric or probabilistic interpretation.
Flexible and generalizable — works with any distance metric.
Stability-driven output is robust to parameter tweaking.

Pairwise distance computation can be a serious bottleneck.
Requires thoughtful parameter choices (min_samples, min_cluster_size).
Not easily interpretable step-by-step for very high-dimensional data.

Mathematical elegance vs. scalability: The algorithm is beautifully designed but computationally heavy.
Precision vs. speed: Exact distances yield accuracy, but approximations enable scale.

🚧 Step 6: Common Misunderstandings

🚨 Common Misunderstandings (Click to Expand)

“HDBSCAN is black-box magic.” In truth, each step — distance, graph, MST, pruning — has clear mathematical meaning.
“The MST step creates clusters directly.” No, the MST encodes connectivity, but clusters only emerge after condensation and stability analysis.
“All clusters are formed at once.” Clusters evolve through the hierarchy — HDBSCAN observes how they persist, not where they start.

🧩 Step 7: Mini Summary

🧠 What You Learned: You’ve conceptually walked through HDBSCAN’s entire implementation pipeline — from distance computation to stability-based cluster extraction.

⚙️ How It Works: HDBSCAN builds a mutual reachability graph, compresses it into an MST, condenses hierarchical relationships, and keeps only persistent clusters.

🎯 Why It Matters: Seeing each step’s purpose transforms HDBSCAN from a mysterious algorithm into an elegant, interpretable system of density-based reasoning and graph theory.

3.2. Scale to Large Datasets 2.2. Density Estimation Viewpoint